Google has urged the US Supreme Court to reverse a landmark ruling, which held that key elements of the Android mobile operating system breach the copyright for the Java programming code.
In a submission to the Supreme Court filed on Jan 6, Google argued that the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit’s March 2018 judgment in favour of Java owner Oracle threatened software innovation.
The Supreme Court agreed to hear Google’s case last November. The decade-long dispute concerns whether application software interfaces (APIs), which allow third-party developers’ apps to function on Android, are protected by copyright.
Google’s Android mobile operating system uses Java programming code to allow third-party developers’ apps to work.
This was essential, Google argues, to avoid the pitfalls of early smartphone operating systems that did not have access to a wide range of publicly available third-party apps.
“The net effect of Oracle’s novel approach would be to empower Oracle (and other software companies) to prevent anyone from developing a product compatible with their software interfaces,” Google argued in the latest court filing.
Specifically, Google says that its use of a small portion of Java script constitutes fair use under the US Copyright Act’s ‘merger’ doctrine.
According to Google, Oracle is attempting to claim copyright protection over the function of the Java code itself, “as opposed to the author’s expression”.
The portions of Java code used by Google were minimal as necessary to allow third-party Java-based apps to function properly on the Android system, Google argued.
The “phrases” of Java code involved were too minimal to be protectable under copyright, the company said.
Source: World IP Review
