Register
Sign in
Newsletter Subscription
Chinese
English
Home
Article
IP Firms Directory
Newsletter
Advertising
Browse by Attribute
Patent
Trademark
Copyright
Trade Secrets
Anti-Monopoly
Unfair Competition
Internet & Domain
Comprehensive Reports
Article Ranking
“2007 China IT Users Annual Conference” Awards Prize for “Authentic Software”
A case study of corporate management perspective on trade secrets
Honda: respect intellectual property, bring joy to people’s life
Well-Known Trademark Protection in China
Trade secrets rules, regulation and enforcement in China and the U.S.--- a comparative analysis
Reflections on alternative divisional applications
Non-law enforcement methods to tackle Olympic ambush marketing
Focus on trade secret-GE vs. Jiuxiang(I)
A Dispute on the Legal Attribution of MTVs
Copyright
By Liu Y
2008/07/10 16:30:33
The Dispute on the Karaoke Royalty Charge – from actions of infringement to the collection of royalties
Copyright
By Wu Do
2008/07/10 16:10:11
Who is the Final Winner in the Karaoke Royalty Dispute?
Copyright
By Harry
2008/07/10 15:54:35
Former U.S. Senator Birch Bayh in China to introduce the Bayh-Dole Act
Comprehensive Reports
By Liu Y
2008/07/10 15:37:48
Microsoft Announces Vision and Strategy to Accelerate Virtualization Adoption
Comprehensive Reports
By Harry
2008/07/10 15:36:12
New
Technical standards and patent infringement
Patent
Issue24
2008/09/12 15:58:24
Well-Known Trademark Protection in China
Trademark
Issue 15
2008/08/01 14:35:57
New trends in IP trials at Beijing High People’s Court in 2007 (I)
Patent
Issue24
2008/09/12 16:10:50
The Doctrine of Equivalence is ONLY Applicable for the Comparison of Technical Features
Patent
Issue 14
2008/08/01 10:53:01
Decision Boundary between the "Use" and "Making" of Industrial Design Patents
Patent
By Yao B
2008/07/10 16:46:30
“2007 China IT Users Annual Conference” Awards Prize for “Authentic Software”
Copyright
By Harry
2008/07/10 15:35:02
New
Honda: respect intellectual property, bring joy to people’s life
“Trade secret” was first statutorily mentioned in China when the Civil Procedure was revised in 1991.Its conceptual framework
Comprehensive Reports
Issue24
2008/09/12 15:30:49
Proper viewer standard for determining similarity in designs patent
Patent
Issue24
2008/09/12 15:00:29
New
Reflections on alternative divisional applications
Patent
Issue24
2008/09/12 15:45:42
New
Non-law enforcement methods to tackle Olympic ambush marketing
Comprehensive Reports
Issue 24
2008/09/12 14:08:08
Strategies on Trademark Snatching Prevention and Remedies
Trademark
Issue 14
2008/07/11 10:20:00
Obviousness following the United States supreme court
Patent
Issue24
2008/09/12 16:50:13
Trade secrets rules, regulation and enforcement in China and the U.S.--- a comparative analysis
Trade Secrets
Issue24
2008/09/24 15:12:01
A case study of corporate management perspective on trade secrets
Trade Secrets
Issue22
2008/09/24 15:10:01
New
Focus on trade secret-GE vs. Jiuxiang(I)
“Trade secret” was first statutorily mentioned in China when the Civil Procedure was revised in 1991.Its conceptual framework
Trade Secrets
Issue24
2008/09/12 17:13:07
First
Prev
...
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
...
Next
Last
International IP Firms
Inquiry and Assessment
Firm Name:
Country:
Please Select
Afghanistan
Albania
Argentina
Armenia
Australia
Austria
Azerbaijan
Bahrain
Bangladesh
Barbados
Belarus
Belgium
Belize
Bolivia
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Brazil
Bulgaria
Cambodia
Cameroon
Canada
Chile
China
Colombia
Congo(Kinshasa)
Costa Rica
Croatia
Cuba
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Denmark
Dominican Republic
Ecuador
Egypt
Estonia
Fiji
Finland
France
Georgia
Germany
Greece
Guatemala
Honduras
Hong Kong-China
Hungary
Iceland
India
Indonesia
Iran
Iraq
Ireland
Israel
Italy
Japan
Jordan
Kazakhstan
Kenya
Kosovo
Kuwait
Kyrgyzstan
Laos
Latvia
Lebanon
Liechtenstein
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Macau-China
Macedonia
Malaysia
Maldives
Malta
Mauritius
Mexico
Moldova
Mongolia
Montenegro
Morocco
Myanmar
Netherlands
New Zealand
Nicaragua
Nigeria
North Korea
Norway
Oman
Pakistan
Panama
Paraguay
Peru
Philippines
Poland
Portugal
Puerto Rico
Romania
Russia
Saudi Arabia
Serbia
Seychelles
Singapore
Slovak Republic
Slovenia
South Africa
South Korea
Spain
Sri Lanka
Sudan
Suriname
Sweden
Switzerland
Syria
Taiwan-China
Tajikistan
Tanzania
Thailand
Trinidad and Tobago
Turkey
Turkmenistan
Ukraine
United Arab Emirates
United Kingdom
Uruguay
USA
Uzbekistan
Venezuela
Vietnam
Zimbabwe
Nepal
Brunei
Bhutan
Ghana
Qatar
Libya
Uganda
Palestine
Yemen
City:
Practice Area:
Please Select
Patent
Trademark
Copyright
Design
Domain name
Competition Law
Anti-Unfair Competition
Others
Antitrust
Unified Patent Court
Patent Litigation
Patent Prosecution
Latest comments
to
Crane IP Law Firm
i****
10-25
Great result
to
RutmanIP
msh****
06-08
These are highly competent and excellent patent attorneys in Israel. If you need attention to detail, 100% results on office actions, and good prices this is the one.
to
Best & Swift IP Services
****
03-31
Best &Swift IP Services is very very professional firm in all aspects so we highly recommend.
to
3 BAY PATENT ANONIM SIRKETI
****
03-17
Great service
to
Am Badar & Am Badar
****
02-02
Recommended IP Firm in Indonesia
to
TM TAMAYO - CARLOS TAMAYO
****
11-23
TM Tamayo has great capacity for the valuation of intangibles and commercialization in Latin America of property rights
to
Fabián Biali y Asociados
****
10-05
They don´t speak chinese
to
METIDA Law Firm Zaboliene and Partners
****
09-28
pleasure to work with
to
CNV - CARLOS ANTONIO, NEVES & VIDAL ADVOGADOS ASSOCIADOS
****
03-03
Realible.
to
WINCO
****
12-30
Thank winco for support my Patent reg. in Viet nam.
to
Estudio Carolina Ore Gomez y Asociados
****
05-13
Wonderful job
to
HERNANDEZ MARTI ABOGADOS
****
01-16
很好
to
TRADEMARK.EU-Georg Pintz & Partners
****
08-07
Excellent attorneys with precise and innovative solutions.
to
Galifanov, Malkov & Partners LLC
****
04-14
Everything is fine!
Article Search
Keywords:
Online Survey
In your opinion, which is the most important factor that influences IP pledge loan evaluation?
Control over several core technologies for one product by different right owners
Stability of ownership of the pledge
Ownership and effectiveness of the pledge